When you stop to think about it, it's pretty amazing how facebook has evolved into such a dynamic political forum. Atleast for my circle of friends, I should say.
And I'd forgotten how progressive minded my bubble is; I realized this when my classmate M showed me status updates of his friends after Obama's win. M is from the South, and the racist/hateful comments pouring from his friends were eye-opening. And M is a black dude.
Made me fear for Obama's safety.
These are college-aged, educated, computer/facebook savy people in the South. Scary to think of the others.
"The racist rats are coming out the woodworks." -Professor at Univ. of Alabama, in an article from CNN highlighting the increase in hate crimes throughout the nation.
Anyways, point is I'm glad my friends are open-minded and socially-conscious. I guess it's natural to surround yourself with like-minded people, but I'm appreciative nonetheless.
So I was going to rant about prop 8 passing in CA, but I found a nicely written comment on facebook. I got lazy and decided I'd just post it instead. It's written by someone from my high school that I haven't seen/talked to in years.
Yesterday at 7:29pm
"It irks me when individuals who oppose gay marriage use statements such as this to validate voting against it:
“My belief is that the traditional definition of marriage should be preserved.”
My first question is – Who’s tradition are we talking about? My second question is – How does marriage between two loving individuals impair or impede other marriages? And my third is – What right do we have to impose our own beliefs on others?
1. Whose tradition are we talking about?
I know there are a lot of people who might be a little defensive – especially those who agree with that earlier statement. No matter what I might say about various marriage traditions of the past [which include arranged marriage, taking multiple spouses, anti-miscegenation laws (laws preventing interracial marriage that were in place as late as 1967), dowries, etc…], I know I won’t get through. So I’ll go on to my 2nd question.
2. How does marriage between two loving individuals impair or impede other marriages?
Implied in the original statement is that, should the “traditional definition” of marriage not be preserved, something dire will happen. Somehow, there are those of the belief that inclusion of same-sex individuals in marriage would diminish other marriages.
Here’s a challenge: reread that statement above. Now, in place of the word “marriage”, put in something else. Examples? Here are a few: Voting. Education. Citizenship. I’m sure you can think of a few more.
Am I saying that gay marriage equates with these other issues? Yes, I am. These are all issues regarding equality under the law. Whenever the potential for extending civil rights comes up, there are people who respond by saying that things have always been done a certain way and that we should keep things the way they are. And then, when it’s getting a little too close for comfort, they begin to instill fear. “Their vote will nullify your vote.” “Their kids will crowd our schools”. “Their citizenship will lessen our citizenship’s worth.” “Their marriage will diminish ours.”
Opponents of gay marriage will cite civil unions as an equitable alternative, despite history telling us that “separate but equal” just doesn’t work. American citizenship separated into different categories by gender, separate voting facilities and locations based on religion, different public educational and recreational complexes for kids based on race. None of that makes sense for the simple reason that equality isn’t equal if it’s separate. But… for some reason, in some peoples’ minds, it is in the case of gay marriage. Odd how that’s the one exception. Time to move on.
3. What right do we have to impose our religious beliefs on others?
I don’t believe in Santa Claus. In fact, I’m Buddhist, so Christmas holds no religious significance to me. Does that mean I would support a constitutional amendment barring public schools from recognizing Christmas? Of course not. Christmas is an important observance by many people in this country, and I respect that. I also respect other religions and having their holidays and significance taught to children alongside Christmas. It does not mean that I advocate teachers telling their kids what to believe, but rather that we need to teach kids about our nation’s diversity and leave the “belief” aspect to parents.
I see gay marriage in a similar light. You don’t have to believe that marriage between two people of the same gender is right any more I have to believe that the son of God was born to a virgin. You have the right to have those beliefs, but that doesn’t mean that you should prevent me from practicing mine."